Belfast Agreement Brexit
The US could accept any Brexit deal between Britain and the EU, with the exception of a no-deal. In an ideal world, the U.S. government would have facilitated dialogue between the parties as it has done in the past; For example, it could have helped negotiate an acceptable variant of a backstop only for Northern Ireland or supported efforts to restore devolved government. At this point, government interventions that defend a party for its own benefit are seen as disruptive rather than helpful. But at the very least, he should refrain from advocating a catastrophic no-deal Brexit, which, according to the UK government`s contingency plans33, would have significant negative consequences – including for America`s longstanding interest in a peaceful and prosperous Northern Ireland. The Irish backstop was a protocol to the (unratified) Brexit Withdrawal Agreement that would have kept the UK (in general) in the European Union`s customs union and Northern Ireland (in particular) in some aspects of the European single market until a solution was found to prevent a hard border. This was done in order not to jeopardise the Good Friday Agreement[47] and to preserve the integrity of the European internal market. This would only have entered into force if there had been no other solutions at the end of the (agreed) transitional period. When Boris Johnson replaced May as prime minister last July, he promised to revise the Brexit deal. Last week, it agreed with EU leaders to remove the backstop and replace it with a revised protocol for Northern Ireland4, which would enter into force at the end of the transition period (which is currently due to expire on 31 December 2020). Northern Ireland will remain in the UK`s customs territory and VAT zone, but will adapt to EU rules in these areas. It will also remain largely aligned with EU rules on goods. Four years after the end of the transition, the Northern Ireland Assembly will vote on the continuation of these agreements.5 With the exception of the consent mechanism, the protocol is similar to the backstop initially proposed by the EU and rejected by Theresa May only for Northern Ireland.
These institutional arrangements, created in these three strands, are defined in the agreement as “interwoven and interdependent”. In particular, it notes that the functioning of the Northern Ireland Assembly and the North-South Council of Ministers is “so closely linked that the success of the other depends” and that participation in the North-South Council of Ministers is “one of the essential responsibilities associated with the relevant posts in [Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland]”. On 10 October, Johnson and Taoiseach Leo Varadkar had “very positive and very promising” discussions that led to a resumption of negotiations[92], and a week later, on 17 October, Johnson and Jean-Claude Juncker announced that they had agreed (subject to ratification) on a new withdrawal agreement that would replace the backstop with a new protocol on Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. [93] The Loyalist Communities Council, an umbrella organization representing the views of the UVF, UDA and Red Hand Commando, wrote a letter to Boris Johnson and Irish Taoiseach Micheál Martin warning of a “permanent destruction” of the 1998 peace agreement without any changes to the post-Brexit arrangements for Northern Ireland. Under that agreement, the British and Irish Governments undertook to hold referendums in Northern Ireland and the Republic on 22 May 1998 respectively. The referendum in Northern Ireland is expected to endorse the agreement reached in the multi-party negotiations. The purpose of the referendum on the Republic of Ireland was to approve the BRITANNICO-Irish Agreement and to facilitate the amendment of the Constitution of Ireland in accordance with the Agreement. The agreement reaffirms the commitment to “mutual respect, civil rights and religious freedoms of all members of the community.” The multi-party agreement recognised “the importance of respect, understanding and tolerance with regard to linguistic diversity”, in particular with regard to the Irish language, Ulster Scots and the languages of other ethnic minorities in Northern Ireland, “all of which are part of the cultural richness of the island of Ireland”. The British Government is virtually out of the equation, and neither the British Parliament nor the British people have the right under this agreement to impede the achievement of Irish unity if it had the consent of the peoples of the North and the South. Our nation is and remains a nation with 32 counties.
Antrim and Down are and will remain as much a part of Ireland as any county in the south. [20] Since about 2005, the border has been perceived as invisible, with little or no physical infrastructure, as security barriers and checkpoints have been removed due to processes introduced by the Good Friday Agreement (or “Belfast Agreement”) signed in 1998. [2] [b] [3] This Agreement has the status of both an international treaty between the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland (British-Irish Agreement) and an agreement of the Parties in Northern Ireland (Multi-Party Agreement). US Senator George Mitchell, who led the negotiations on the Belfast Agreement, said he believed the creation of a border control system between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland could jeopardise the agreement. [8] Investigations conducted on the 18th. Published in February 2019 by Irish Senator Mark Daly and two UNESCO presidents, suggested that the reintroduction of a hard border would lead to a return to violence. [9] [10] [11] [12] The Good Friday Agreement (GFA) or Belfast Agreement (Irish: Comhaontú Aoine an Chéasta or Comhaontú Bhéal Feirste; Ulster-Scots: Guid Friday Greeance or Bilfawst Greeance),[1] is a pair of agreements signed on 10 April 1998 that ended most of the violence of the Troubles, a political conflict in Northern Ireland that had taken place since the late 1960s. .
.
